Skip to Main Content

COMM101E: Oral Rhetoric - Environmental Sustainability

Evaluating Sources - Practice

Sample Topic - Fast fashion in college campus (esp. sports/ athletics)

Sample Topic - Invasive species in the Great Lakes

Sample Topic - Food waste

Evaluation Criteria Checklists: Options

Checklist Option 1:  "4 R's - In one popular public speaking textbook (Osborne, Public Speaking), the authors recommend that when evaluating sources, you ask if the source meets these criteria:

  • Relevant
  • Representative
  • Recent
  • Reliable

Checklist Option 2: "CRAAP" - Another set of evaluative criteria you may have heard before is "CRAAP":

  • Currency
  • Relevance
  • Authority
  • Accuracy
  • Purpose

Checklist Option 3: "3 Scales" - In Hekman's "Introduction to Evaluation" video, we boil it down further to:

  • Relevance
  • Authority
  • Bias

Summary:  Any of these checklists can work!  Choose your favorite, or the most memorable to you. But remember, considering the context (purpose and audience) of sources is critical in your evaluation.

Another Approach: SIFT and Lateral Reading

Information literacy researcher Mike Caulfield has developed another method of evaluating sources, called SIFT:

Image credit: Mike Caulfield's SIFT (Four Moves), which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lateral Reading: A closely related approach is "lateral reading," a technique used by fact-checkers to go outside websites or sources to investigate based on external (rather than internal) information and clues.

For a more in-depth guide to using SIFT and lateral reading, check out this guide from Rowan University's library.